Tuesday, March 5, 2019

Plasma or urine metanephrines?

I have discussed plasma versus urine metanephrines in the past. Recently a few doctors asked me this question again. I figure that if some doctors are not clear whether to order plasma or urine metanephrines, patients probably also want to know the pros and cons of plasma and urine metanephrines.
      First of all, both tests are great. If your local area only offers one of them, take it. If your local area offers both tests, which one is better? Shall you do both? My personal preference is plasma metanephrines. The plasma test is convenient and can be done to any patient at any time. The only small drawback is the blood draw itself. If you really hate needles, the plasma test could be an issue. The urine test offers no practical advantage over the plasma test. In theory and in earlier reports, the urine test is less prone to false positive results. In real clinical practice, the urine test and the plasma test perform similarly. The urine test is laborious to collect (24-hour urine is required), not reliable in patients with kidney problems, and hard to do in children. Lastly, the urine test results have to be corrected by urine creatinine. I have seen patients who passed ~5 liters of urine in 24 hours; of course the metanephrines levels are higher simply because of the large urine volume. The results usually are more accurate after they are divided by the total amount of creatinine in the urine. Again I want to emphasize that I personally don’t see why one would need the urine metanephrines for pheo diagnosis if plasma test is available. There is also no need to do both tests.
       
Dr. Pheo

12 comments:

  1. Hi Dr Pheo,
    Should the urine collection container have a preservative added?

    Also, do you agree with some of the recent papers that put the chance of a pheo with NF1 and high bp at up to 50%?

    There are also a few published case histories where people have had a pheo without ever getting a positive test result - is this happening more often now?
    Many thanks for your blog, it is very much appreciated.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear Debbie Sutherland,

    Thanks for your compliments.

    The urine preservative is preferred but probably not essential.

    I think the rate of pheo is lower than 50% in patients with NF1 and hypertension.

    People with small pheos can have normal tests. Extra-adrenal pheos (paragangliomas) may be non-functional as well. Sizable adrenal pheos are mostly functional and associated with high test results.

    Dr. Pheo

    ReplyDelete
  3. Many thanks for your reply. My 24hr collection has come back negative but my GP has no idea what's causing episodes of bp spikes with tachycardia and arrythmia and migraine. Am waiting to see an endocrinologist but the wait list is long!
    I have severe muscle weakness and only just dx with NF1 even though in my 50's.

    Any suggestions of what differential dx could be looked at would be appreciated.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Debbie Sutherland,

      Sorry but I don't know. There are many differential diagnoses of pheo. Please discuss with your local doctors.

      Dr. Pheo

      Delete
  4. Dr. Pheo,

    Wonderful blog. Thank you for your time and so much informative knowledge.

    When I was a child (12 years old or so) doctors thought I had a Pheo based on some lab results...they couldn’t find one on my adrenals so no further test were done. It’s been 20 years and I can’t verify what the past labs were. Fast forward to now (42 years old) , I have been diagnosed with POTS Syndrome which you know has very similar symptoms. I just panic out of the blue, often after meals. I have abdominal bloating, can’t regulate body temp, palpitations, blood pressure spikes with movement and standing. Have passed out twice. All cardio test are negative. AC1 is good but my BS spikes to 180 all the time (has been In the 200’s on occasions). I strongly believed I could have a Pheo but MET labs are all negative now. Abdominal MRI showed the following:

    Small mildly T2 hyperintense foci in the spleen are nonspecific but could represent cysts or hemangiomata. Hepatic size is within limits of hepatic signal is normal 0.7 cm on 72 hyperintense focus is seen in right hepatic lobe.
    Adrenal glands and kidneys appear normal.

    Impression: subcentimeter T2 foci in the liver and spleen likely represent cysts or hemangiomata. Ultrasound confirmation recommended.

    Could these cysts possibly be pheo’s?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Just SWEET Freeborn BOYS!,

      It is clear that you don't have pheo. Cysts are common in liver and spleen; they are usually not a health problem.

      Dr. Pheo

      Delete
  5. Dr Pheo,
    I have recently been tested for theochromocytoma because I've been having spikes in blood pressure. I have two recommended blood tests and the 24 hour urine test all of which came back with high levels and indicating pheo. I was then sent for a CT scan which I had to drink a solution before and die was injected through IV during the scan. I was told no tumor showed in the scan. So no pheo. Is it possible that it would not show in CT scan. I'm still getting high bp spikes and day to day bp still high. Should I be concerned?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Unknown,

      This will depend on how high your test results actually are. Please let me know the exact test results and the normal range of the tests.

      Dr. Pheo

      Delete
  6. Kevinandlaurafairley@gmail.comAugust 27, 2019 at 7:32 PM

    I am under surveillance for positive SDHB mutation
    10 family members have positive mutations and 3 with active pheo’s. In the past my urine and blood has been
    Normal but recently I had plasma Mets done and first lab came back with low catecholamines...so doc re ordered....now this one has high dopamine —250!( should be <20)....should I be concerned ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Kevinandlaurafairley,

      An isolated and slightly high dopamine level should not be a concern.

      Dr. Pheo

      Delete
  7. Hello,

    I have MEN2A. I'm always nervous and sometimes I have anxiety.

    I have the following results with 24h urine test:

    Normetanephrine: 407 , ref range 88-444
    Metanephrine: 245, ref range 85-345

    All the other values are normal, but I'm afraid because I did very low urine in the last spot (second morning) because I was nervous. I'm thinking that if I had expelled the urine normally, the normetanephine value would be above the uppercut value.

    My doctor says its all ok but I'm worried about this

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Megan,

      I agree with your doctor that you probably don't have an active pheo. In people with MEN2A or 2B, the metanephrine level (more important than normetaneprhine) is the one to watch for.

      Dr. Pheo

      Delete